{"id":752,"date":"2026-11-05T22:20:23","date_gmt":"2026-11-05T22:20:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blog.indiafortomorrow.com\/library\/0669\/"},"modified":"2026-11-05T22:20:23","modified_gmt":"2026-11-05T22:20:23","slug":"0669","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/blog.indiafortomorrow.com\/library\/0669\/","title":{"rendered":"Policy Review System"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><main id=\"main\"><\/p>\n<nav aria-label=\"Breadcrumb\" class=\"breadcrumbs\"><a href=\"\/\">Home<\/a><a href=\"\/library\/\">Topic library<\/a><span aria-current=\"page\">Policy Review System<\/span><\/nav>\n<section class=\"section source-head\"><a class=\"text-link\" href=\"\/library\/?family=governance\">\u2190 Governance library<\/a><\/p>\n<div class=\"eyebrow\">From the IFT source library<\/div>\n<h1>Policy Review System<\/h1>\n<p class=\"note\">Text from the existing IFT website. Sources and claims are still under editorial review.<\/p>\n<p><a class=\"text-link\" href=\"https:\/\/reimagine.indiafortomorrow.com\/governance\/policy-review\/\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Original source \u2197<\/a><\/section>\n<div class=\"reader-layout organised-reader\">\n<nav aria-label=\"On this page\" class=\"inside-toc\">\n<h2>On this page<\/h2>\n<p><a href=\"#reading-section-01\">Where the problem happens<\/a><a href=\"#evidence-snapshot\">Evidence Snapshot<\/a><a href=\"#reading-section-02\">Why the problem happens<\/a><a href=\"#reading-section-03\">Evidence<\/a><a href=\"#reading-section-04\">How the parts work together<\/a><a href=\"#reading-section-05\">A solution suited to India<\/a><a href=\"#reading-section-06\">Roadmap<\/a><a href=\"#reading-section-07\">How to measure improvement<\/a><a href=\"#reading-section-08\">Rights &amp; safeguards<\/a><\/nav>\n<article class=\"source-copy\"><span aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"legacy-anchor\" id=\"topic-section-1\"><\/span><span aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"legacy-anchor\" id=\"topic-section-2\"><\/span><span aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"legacy-anchor\" id=\"topic-section-3\"><\/span><span aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"legacy-anchor\" id=\"topic-section-4\"><\/span><span aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"legacy-anchor\" id=\"topic-section-5\"><\/span><span aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"legacy-anchor\" id=\"topic-section-6\"><\/span><span aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"legacy-anchor\" id=\"topic-section-7\"><\/span><span aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"legacy-anchor\" id=\"topic-section-8\"><\/span><span aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"legacy-anchor\" id=\"topic-section-9\"><\/span><span aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"legacy-anchor\" id=\"topic-section-10\"><\/span><span aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"legacy-anchor\" id=\"topic-section-11\"><\/span><span aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"legacy-anchor\" id=\"topic-section-12\"><\/span><span aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"legacy-anchor\" id=\"topic-section-13\"><\/span><span aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"legacy-anchor\" id=\"topic-section-14\"><\/span><span aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"legacy-anchor\" id=\"topic-section-15\"><\/span><span aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"legacy-anchor\" id=\"topic-section-16\"><\/span><span aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"legacy-anchor\" id=\"topic-section-17\"><\/span><span aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"legacy-anchor\" id=\"topic-section-18\"><\/span><span aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"legacy-anchor\" id=\"topic-section-19\"><\/span><span aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"legacy-anchor\" id=\"topic-section-20\"><\/span><span aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"legacy-anchor\" id=\"topic-section-21\"><\/span><span aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"legacy-anchor\" id=\"topic-section-22\"><\/span><span aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"legacy-anchor\" id=\"topic-section-23\"><\/span><span aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"legacy-anchor\" id=\"topic-section-24\"><\/span><span aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"legacy-anchor\" id=\"topic-section-25\"><\/span><span aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"legacy-anchor\" id=\"topic-section-26\"><\/span><span aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"legacy-anchor\" id=\"topic-section-27\"><\/span><span aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"legacy-anchor\" id=\"topic-section-28\"><\/span><span aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"legacy-anchor\" id=\"topic-section-29\"><\/span><span aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"legacy-anchor\" id=\"topic-section-30\"><\/span><\/p>\n<section class=\"reading-section\" id=\"reading-section-01\">\n<p class=\"eyebrow\">Section 01<\/p>\n<h2>Where the problem happens<\/h2>\n<p>Define the failure from the affected person\u2019s journey.<\/p>\n<p>Policies can persist because they exist, even when objectives, conditions or evidence have changed.<\/p>\n<h3>Required local context<\/h3>\n<p>Record state\/UT, district, city\/block, village\/ward or facility; service or incident; date and reference period; affected group; requested action; failed stage; delay, cost or harm; responsible authority; evidence source; privacy level; and what remains uncertain.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n<section class=\"evidence-snapshot\" data-evidence-version=\"2026-11-05\" id=\"evidence-snapshot\">\n<p class=\"eyebrow\">Data reference table<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"evidence-snapshot-heading\">Evidence Snapshot<\/h2>\n<p>Read each value with its reporting period, population and limitations. A historical national reference is not a local baseline or proof that an IFT proposal works.<\/p>\n<p class=\"evidence-status\">4 measurement records still need data and a review of their relevance.<\/p>\n<div aria-labelledby=\"evidence-snapshot-heading\" class=\"evidence-scroll\" role=\"region\" tabindex=\"0\">\n<table class=\"evidence-table\">\n<caption>Data references for Policy Review System<\/caption>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th scope=\"col\">Signal<\/th>\n<th scope=\"col\">Reference Value<\/th>\n<th scope=\"col\">Period \/ Population<\/th>\n<th scope=\"col\">How to Read It<\/th>\n<th scope=\"col\">Source Status<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr class=\"data-required-record\" data-evidence-record=\"need-669-1\">\n<th scope=\"row\">Objective achieved<\/th>\n<td>\n<p>Not established<\/p>\n<p class=\"evidence-small\">Data required \u2014 not zero<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td>\n<p>Reporting period: Information Required<\/p>\n<p>Population and geography: Information Required<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td>\n<p>Proposed measure; no observed value is established here.<\/p>\n<p>Limitations: Define the measure, unit, reporting period and covered population; obtain a traceable dataset and review its suitability for this topic before using a number.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td>\n<p>Source organisation: Information Required<\/p>\n<p>Direct source URL: not yet verified<\/p>\n<p>Source publication date: not established<\/p>\n<p class=\"evidence-verification\">Verification status: Data required<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"data-required-record\" data-evidence-record=\"need-669-2\">\n<th scope=\"row\">Cost-effectiveness<\/th>\n<td>\n<p>Not established<\/p>\n<p class=\"evidence-small\">Data required \u2014 not zero<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td>\n<p>Reporting period: Information Required<\/p>\n<p>Population and geography: Information Required<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td>\n<p>Proposed measure; no observed value is established here.<\/p>\n<p>Limitations: Define the measure, unit, reporting period and covered population; obtain a traceable dataset and review its suitability for this topic before using a number.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td>\n<p>Source organisation: Information Required<\/p>\n<p>Direct source URL: not yet verified<\/p>\n<p>Source publication date: not established<\/p>\n<p class=\"evidence-verification\">Verification status: Data required<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"data-required-record\" data-evidence-record=\"need-669-3\">\n<th scope=\"row\">Distributional effect<\/th>\n<td>\n<p>Not established<\/p>\n<p class=\"evidence-small\">Data required \u2014 not zero<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td>\n<p>Reporting period: Information Required<\/p>\n<p>Population and geography: Information Required<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td>\n<p>Proposed measure; no observed value is established here.<\/p>\n<p>Limitations: Define the measure, unit, reporting period and covered population; obtain a traceable dataset and review its suitability for this topic before using a number.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td>\n<p>Source organisation: Information Required<\/p>\n<p>Direct source URL: not yet verified<\/p>\n<p>Source publication date: not established<\/p>\n<p class=\"evidence-verification\">Verification status: Data required<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"data-required-record\" data-evidence-record=\"need-669-4\">\n<th scope=\"row\">Unintended harm<\/th>\n<td>\n<p>Not established<\/p>\n<p class=\"evidence-small\">Data required \u2014 not zero<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td>\n<p>Reporting period: Information Required<\/p>\n<p>Population and geography: Information Required<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td>\n<p>Proposed measure; no observed value is established here.<\/p>\n<p>Limitations: Define the measure, unit, reporting period and covered population; obtain a traceable dataset and review its suitability for this topic before using a number.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td>\n<p>Source organisation: Information Required<\/p>\n<p>Direct source URL: not yet verified<\/p>\n<p>Source publication date: not established<\/p>\n<p class=\"evidence-verification\">Verification status: Data required<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<p>Different surveys, administrative records, estimates and reporting years are not interchangeable. No combined IFT score is calculated from these rows.<\/p>\n<p class=\"evidence-audit-link\"><a href=\"\/downloads\/evidence-audit.csv\">Evidence coverage and review log (CSV)<\/a> \u00b7 <a href=\"\/assets\/evidence-register.json\">Structured evidence register (JSON)<\/a><\/p>\n<\/section>\n<section class=\"reading-section\" id=\"reading-section-02\">\n<p class=\"eyebrow\">Section 02<\/p>\n<h2>Why the problem happens<\/h2>\n<p>Test the system before blaming a person.<\/p>\n<p>No review date<\/p>\n<p>Check process records, capacity, incentives, law, technology, funding and user experience before confirming this hypothesis.<\/p>\n<p>Weak outcome data<\/p>\n<p>Check process records, capacity, incentives, law, technology, funding and user experience before confirming this hypothesis.<\/p>\n<p>Institutional inertia<\/p>\n<p>Check process records, capacity, incentives, law, technology, funding and user experience before confirming this hypothesis.<\/p>\n<p>Immediate errors, structural constraints, institutional incentives and local conditions may interact. Correlation, a complaint count or a dashboard gap does not by itself establish cause.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n<section class=\"reading-section\" id=\"reading-section-03\">\n<p class=\"eyebrow\">Section 03<\/p>\n<h2>Evidence<\/h2>\n<p>Build a traceable decision record.<\/p>\n<ul class=\"component-name-list\">\n<li>Question Required proof<\/li>\n<li>What happened? Dated case, service or incident record<\/li>\n<li>Where and to whom? Administrative level, facility and affected group<\/li>\n<li>How large is it? Denominator, period and comparable definition<\/li>\n<li>Why did it happen? Process trace, interviews and competing explanations<\/li>\n<li>What already exists? Law, scheme, budget, staffing and implementation status<\/li>\n<li>Did action work? Baseline, target, result, cost, equity and adverse effects<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Official source \u2260 verified conclusion. Data freshness, completeness, legal meaning, local resolution and independent review still matter.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n<section class=\"reading-section\" id=\"reading-section-04\">\n<p class=\"eyebrow\">Section 04<\/p>\n<h2>How the parts work together<\/h2>\n<p>What must work together.<\/p>\n<p>Original purpose<\/p>\n<p>Define owner, lawful authority, standard, capacity, data, public interface, escalation and review.<\/p>\n<p>Outcome change<\/p>\n<p>Cost<\/p>\n<p>Unintended effects<\/p>\n<p>Continue\/modify\/stop<\/p>\n<\/section>\n<section class=\"reading-section\" id=\"reading-section-05\">\n<p class=\"eyebrow\">Section 05<\/p>\n<h2>A solution suited to India<\/h2>\n<p>Design around rights, access and operating reality.<\/p>\n<p>Require a review trigger, independent evidence, affected-group feedback and explicit decision.<\/p>\n<h3>BOUNDED PILOT<\/h3>\n<p>Conduct a retrospective review of one bounded programme using published criteria.<\/p>\n<p>Pre-register the target group, baseline, responsibilities, safeguards, cost, measurement period, escalation route and stop\/redesign criteria. Include assisted and offline access where digital exclusion is possible.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n<section class=\"reading-section\" id=\"reading-section-06\">\n<p class=\"eyebrow\">Section 06<\/p>\n<h2>Roadmap<\/h2>\n<p>Move through evidence gates\u2014not announcements.<\/p>\n<ul class=\"component-name-list\">\n<li>01 \u00b7 0\u201330 days<\/li>\n<li>Map journey, law, owner and immediate harm<br \/>02 \u00b7 30\u201390 days<\/li>\n<li>Verify records, bottleneck and affected groups<br \/>03 \u00b7 3\u20139 months<\/li>\n<li>Run the bounded pilot with safeguards<br \/>04 \u00b7 9\u201324 months<\/li>\n<li>Evaluate outcome, cost, rights and equity<br \/>05 \u00b7 2\u20135 years<\/li>\n<li>Integrate capability, finance and institutions065+ years<\/li>\n<li>Scale only after transfer and maintenance review<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/section>\n<section class=\"reading-section\" id=\"reading-section-07\">\n<p class=\"eyebrow\">Section 07<\/p>\n<h2>How to measure improvement<\/h2>\n<p>Measure public outcome and system integrity together.<\/p>\n<p>Objective achieved<br \/>Baseline \u2192 target \u2192 actual \u2192 difference \u2192 decision<\/p>\n<p>Cost-effectiveness<br \/>Baseline \u2192 target \u2192 actual \u2192 difference \u2192 decision<\/p>\n<p>Distributional effect<br \/>Baseline \u2192 target \u2192 actual \u2192 difference \u2192 decision<\/p>\n<p>Unintended harm<br \/>Baseline \u2192 target \u2192 actual \u2192 difference \u2192 decision<\/p>\n<p>Decision implemented<br \/>Baseline \u2192 target \u2192 actual \u2192 difference \u2192 decision<\/p>\n<h3>Scale<\/h3>\n<p>Outcome improves, safeguards hold and receiving capacity exists.<\/p>\n<h3>Modify<\/h3>\n<p>Some benefit appears but design, equity, cost or reliability needs repair.<\/p>\n<h3>Stop<\/h3>\n<p>No credible benefit, unacceptable harm or a better alternative exists.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n<section class=\"reading-section\" id=\"reading-section-08\">\n<p class=\"eyebrow\">Section 08<\/p>\n<h2>Rights &amp; safeguards<\/h2>\n<p>Efficiency cannot erase due process.<\/p>\n<ul class=\"component-name-list\">\n<li>No high-impact automated decision without accountable human review and appeal<\/li>\n<li>Collect and share only purpose-necessary data<\/li>\n<li>Protect complainants, witnesses, children and vulnerable people<\/li>\n<li>Publish definitions and limitations; never use ranks as political shaming<\/li>\n<li>Separate allegation, verification, finding and final legal outcome<\/li>\n<li>Keep accessible physical alternatives where digital-only service would exclude<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/section>\n<\/article>\n<aside><span class=\"eyebrow\">CONTINUE EXPLORING<\/span><a class=\"reading-link\" href=\"\/library\/0670\/\">Property Tax &amp; Local Revenue \u2197<\/a><a class=\"reading-link\" href=\"\/library\/0671\/\">Public Infrastructure Maintenance \u2197<\/a><a class=\"reading-link\" href=\"\/library\/0672\/\">Government Project Failure System \u2197<\/a><a class=\"reading-link\" href=\"\/library\/0635\/\">Accessible Justice \u2197<\/a><a class=\"reading-link\" href=\"\/blog\/\">Ideas &amp; articles \u2197<\/a><a class=\"reading-link\" href=\"\/participate\/\">Contribute or correct a source \u2197<\/a><\/aside>\n<\/div>\n<section class=\"section page-faq\">\n<p class=\"eyebrow\">15 questions, answered clearly<\/p>\n<h2>Questions about Policy Review System<\/h2>\n<details>\n<summary>What does Policy Review System focus on?<\/summary>\n<p>Policies can persist because they exist, even when objectives, conditions or evidence have changed.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n<details>\n<summary>What changes does the page propose?<\/summary>\n<p>Require a review trigger, independent evidence, affected-group feedback and explicit decision. Conduct a retrospective review of one bounded programme using published criteria.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n<details>\n<summary>Which parts need to work together?<\/summary>\n<p>The proposed system connects Original purpose; Outcome change; Cost; Unintended effects; Continue\/modify\/stop. Assign a responsible team, service standard, handoff and maintenance plan for each part<\/p>\n<\/details>\n<details>\n<summary>What local information is needed before taking action?<\/summary>\n<p>Record state\/UT, district, city\/block, village\/ward or facility; service or incident; date and reference period; affected group; requested action; failed stage; delay, cost or harm; responsible authority; evidence source; privacy level; and what remains uncertain.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n<details>\n<summary>What could be causing the problem?<\/summary>\n<p>Possible causes to investigate include No review date; Weak outcome data; Institutional inertia. Treat these as questions to test against local records and experience, rather than confirmed causes in every location.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n<details>\n<summary>What evidence should researchers collect?<\/summary>\n<p>Keep a dated record of the location, the service or asset that failed, who was affected, the possible cause, the existing owner or project, and the result after action. Link each observation to its source and method. Official source \u2260 verified conclusion. Data freshness, completeness, legal meaning, local resolution and independent review still matter.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n<details>\n<summary>What could a first trial of Policy Review System look like?<\/summary>\n<p>Conduct a retrospective review of one bounded programme using published criteria. Agree the place, responsible team, comparison, safety checks and measurement period before starting. The trial described here is a proposal, not a reported result.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n<details>\n<summary>How should improvement be measured?<\/summary>\n<p>The page proposes tracking Objective achieved; Cost-effectiveness; Distributional effect; Unintended harm; Decision implemented. Define each measure, record the starting value and reporting period, then compare later results using the same method. Report who benefits and any harm or uncertainty.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n<details>\n<summary>What risks and safeguards need attention?<\/summary>\n<p>No high-impact automated decision without accountable human review and appeal. Collect and share only purpose-necessary data. Protect complainants, witnesses, children and vulnerable people. Publish definitions and limitations; never use ranks as political shaming. Separate allegation, verification, finding and final legal outcome. Keep accessible physical alternatives where digital-only service would exclude.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n<details>\n<summary>What is the suggested order of work?<\/summary>\n<p>Move through evidence gates\u2014not announcements. 0\u201330 days. Map journey, law, owner and immediate harm; 30\u201390 days. Verify records, bottleneck and affected groups; 3\u20139 months. Run the small, controlled trial with safeguards; 9\u201324 months. Evaluate outcome, cost, rights and equity; 2\u20135 years. Integrate capability, finance and institutions; 5+ years. Scale only after transfer and maintenance review. These stages are planning ranges. Actual timing depends on local conditions, resources, permissions and delivery capacity.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n<details>\n<summary>Who should take responsibility for delivery?<\/summary>\n<p>Information Required: the named organisation and accountable local team. Responsibilities must cover Original purpose; Outcome change; Cost; Unintended effects; Continue\/modify\/stop. Assign an owner for each handoff, record how problems will be escalated, and agree who will fund and maintain the work.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n<details>\n<summary>What costs should be checked before approval?<\/summary>\n<p>Record state\/UT, district, city\/block, village\/ward or facility; service or incident; date and reference period; affected group; requested action; failed stage; delay, cost or harm; responsible authority; evidence source; privacy level; and what remains uncertain. Some benefit appears but design, equity, cost or reliability needs repair. Information Required: a local cost estimate, funding source and ongoing operating and maintenance budget. Include costs shifted to households or other services when comparing options.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n<details>\n<summary>How should access and fairness be checked?<\/summary>\n<p>Some benefit appears but design, equity, cost or reliability needs repair. Compare access, costs, safety and results across the groups affected in this location. Record missing information and correct exclusion before expanding the proposal.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n<details>\n<summary>When should the approach expand, change or stop?<\/summary>\n<p>Scale: Outcome improves, safeguards hold and receiving capacity exists. Modify: Some benefit appears but design, equity, cost or reliability needs repair. Stop: No credible benefit, unacceptable harm or a better alternative exists.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n<details>\n<summary>Does this page establish that the proposal has succeeded?<\/summary>\n<p>No verified local result should be inferred from the proposal alone. Information Required: a dated starting measurement, later results, costs, affected groups and an independent assessment. The proposed review should examine Objective achieved; Cost-effectiveness; Distributional effect.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n<\/section>\n<p><\/main><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>HomeTopic libraryPolicy Review System \u2190 Governance library From the IFT source library Policy Review System Text from the existing IFT website. Sources and claims are still under editorial review. Original source \u2197 On this page Where the problem happensEvidence SnapshotWhy the problem happensEvidenceHow the parts work togetherA solution suited to IndiaRoadmapHow to measure improvementRights &amp; [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":84,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"ift_pillar":[],"class_list":["post-752","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_hostinger_reach_plugin_has_subscription_block":false,"_hostinger_reach_plugin_is_elementor":false,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.indiafortomorrow.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/752","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.indiafortomorrow.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.indiafortomorrow.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.indiafortomorrow.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.indiafortomorrow.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=752"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blog.indiafortomorrow.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/752\/revisions"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.indiafortomorrow.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/84"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.indiafortomorrow.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=752"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"ift_pillar","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.indiafortomorrow.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ift_pillar?post=752"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}