Explore IndiaCurrent IndiaTomorrow IndiaSearchReport a problem
India For Tomorrow
[translera_switcher]
← Editorial Standards library
From the IFT source library

Editorial Standards

Updated 4 November 2026. Write clearly, show the evidence and keep the strength of a conclusion within the limits of its sources.

Original source ↗

Make the claim traceable

An important factual claim should identify its source, date, geography, definition and method. Explain missing data, uncertainty and disagreement. Do not present a national average as if it describes every district or person.

Prefer primary evidence where it is available, and check whether a source actually supports the sentence beside it. A link list alone is not verification.

Use clear evidence labels

A proposal is a suggested action for investigation. A community report is an observation not yet independently verified. An illustrative scenario shows assumptions rather than a prediction. A measured result is supported by a defined starting value, actual measurement, period, source and uncertainty.

Use “insufficient evidence” when the available material cannot support a reliable conclusion. A verified label needs a recorded review and a scope narrow enough for that evidence.

Write for ordinary readers

Use everyday words, short paragraphs and headings that explain their section. Explain necessary technical terms. Give a concrete example when it helps a reader understand the decision.

Do not fill a page with repeated slogans, copied widget text, generic claims or title-swapped paragraphs. Keep menus, numbers, form labels and explanations visually and semantically separate.

Create useful original work

A page should add explanation, comparison, local context, evidence limits or a practical decision. Attribute external material and use only material that may be shared.

AI-assisted drafts still need source checks and editorial review. Neither a word count nor fifteen FAQs establishes originality, factual accuracy or completion of a full topic rewrite.

Protect people and allow challenge

Do not turn an unverified allegation into a finding. Avoid identifying children, survivors, patients or private households through text, photographs or precise locations.

Invite readers to challenge evidence and calculations. A material correction should explain the change and date. Disagreement about interpretation should remain distinct from a factual error.

Keep support separate from findings

Advertising, donations, partnerships and personal relationships must not purchase favourable coverage or evidence labels. Disclose material interests and follow the editorial-governance and corrections policies.

Questions and answers

Questions about Editorial Standards

What makes a source useful?

It needs to support the actual claim and make its date, place, definition and method clear. Its limitations matter as much as its headline.

Is a scenario the same as a forecast or result?

No. A scenario explores assumptions. It must not be described as an official prediction or a measured outcome.

Does an AI-written draft count as approved content?

No. Drafts need the same source checks, clarity, attribution and appropriate review as other material.

Does meeting a FAQ count prove quality?

No. Each answer must be useful and relevant. Counts and schema checks do not replace factual and editorial review.

How do I challenge a claim?

Email the page URL, exact claim, proposed correction and supporting evidence to support@indiafortomorrow.com.