Question 1
What specific mechanism or capability is worth studying?
Safer lives. Better care. More choice.
Explore this pillar ›International engagement, trade and partnerships grounded in India’s long-term interests.
Study international mechanisms, markets and research without assuming that a whole country is a ready-made model. Define mutual interests, evidence, institutions and adaptation needs. Collaboration remains proposed until the people and institutions agree.
What specific mechanism or capability is worth studying?
Which Indian conditions would require it to change?
Are roles, ethics, ownership and publication terms agreed?
Data reference table
Read each value with its reporting period, population and limitations. A historical national reference is not a local baseline or proof that an IFT proposal works.
7 source-linked reference records. Publication checks do not independently reproduce the underlying data.
| Signal | Reference Value | Period / Population | How to Read It | Source Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| India’s inscribed World Heritage properties | 44 properties Historical reference | After the 2025 inscription reported in July 2025 India; UNESCO World Heritage List properties | A historical international-recognition reference for heritage discussion. Limitations: This is not a complete inventory of Indian heritage, a conservation-quality score, or a verified current 2026 count. Serial properties can include multiple component sites. | UNESCO International primary publication Maratha Military Landscapes of India inscribed as India’s 44 th World Heritage property Published: 2025-07-15 Publication checked: 2026-11-04 Value, period and coverage checked in publication |
| Exports of goods and services | US$824.9 billion Historical reference | FY 2024–25; publication vintage 2 May 2025 India; combined merchandise and services exports | A national trade-value reference. Limitations: Gross export value is not domestic value added, employment, local prosperity or district export performance. Later revisions must be versioned rather than silently mixed. | Ministry of Commerce & Industry, via PIB Official government release India’s Total Exports in 2024–25 Published: 2025-05-02 Publication checked: 2026-11-04 Value, period and coverage checked in publication |
| Services exports | US$387.5 billion Historical reference | FY 2024–25; publication vintage 2 May 2025 India; services exports | Shows the reported scale of services exports in that annual release. Limitations: The total includes different services, not only software or digitally delivered services. It does not measure domestic jobs, wages or net receipts. | Ministry of Commerce & Industry, via PIB Official government release India’s Total Exports in 2024–25 Published: 2025-05-02 Publication checked: 2026-11-04 Value, period and coverage checked in publication |
| Merchandise exports excluding petroleum products | US$374.1 billion Historical reference | FY 2024–25; publication vintage 2 May 2025 India; non-petroleum merchandise exports | A defined segment of merchandise exports that should be kept separate from total services and all merchandise. Limitations: This is not domestic value added, manufacturing employment or a measure of export quality. Do not add it to combined total exports. | Ministry of Commerce & Industry, via PIB Official government release India’s Total Exports in 2024–25 Published: 2025-05-02 Publication checked: 2026-11-04 Value, period and coverage checked in publication |
| Foreign tourist arrivals | 9.95 million arrivals Historical reference | Calendar 2024 India; foreign tourist arrivals compiled using Bureau of Immigration data | A border-arrivals reference for inbound tourism. Limitations: Arrivals are not necessarily unique people, local destination visits, overnight stays or all international tourist arrivals. The Ministry says it does not maintain further foreign-tourist travel-pattern/destination breakdowns. | Ministry of Tourism, via PIB Official government release Published: 2026-01-29 Publication checked: 2026-11-04 Value, period and coverage checked in publication |
| Estimated direct and indirect tourism employment | 84.63 million Historical reference | FY 2023–24 India; tourism employment estimate based on third Tourism Satellite Account and PLFS | An estimated economy-wide employment reference for tourism discussions. Limitations: This is a model/survey-based estimate, not an administrative headcount or the number of jobs created in one year. The release says gender and rural/urban breakdowns are unavailable. | Ministry of Tourism, via PIB Official government release Published: 2026-01-29 Publication checked: 2026-11-04 Value, period and coverage checked in publication |
| Total annual FDI inflow | US$80.62 billion Historical reference | FY 2024–25; publication vintage 10 December 2025 India; total annual foreign direct investment inflow | A gross inflow reference that must be distinguished from equity-only inflow, net FDI and retained domestic benefit. Limitations: Earlier official releases gave a provisionalUS$81.04 billion. This record preserves the later release’s 80.62 billion figure; do not combine vintages or infer investment quality, jobs or additionality from gross flows. | Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade, Ministry of Commerce & Industry, via PIB Official government release 2025 Year End Review for DPIIT Published: 2025-12-10 Publication checked: 2026-11-04 Value, period and coverage checked in publication |
Different surveys, administrative records, estimates and reporting years are not interchangeable. No combined IFT score is calculated from these rows.
Evidence coverage and review log (CSV) · Structured evidence register (JSON)
Every available subject in this pillar
Read the topic names below and open the subject directly. The groupings are for navigation; each original topic remains separate.
IFT working ideas · Proposals for research
These are questions and proposals to develop, not completed programmes or established results.
Ask faculty-led teams to examine a specific delivery mechanism, costs and failure conditions abroad.
Explain what India should adopt, change or reject; no country is a universal model.
Study product standards, logistics, skills and buyer requirements before recommending export support.
Distinguish feasible market access from promotional targets.
Define mutual research questions, supervision, ownership, ethics and publication rules before collaboration.
List universities as proposed contact targets until consent and agreements exist.
10 questions and answers
Define the Indian problem, the partner or market, the capability sought and the mutual interest. A country name alone does not explain a workable mechanism.
The proposal should identify why the mechanism works and what it requires. Compare Indian institutions, resources, laws, languages and local needs before adapting it.
Study the product or service, real demand, quality requirements, costs, logistics and domestic capability. An export announcement does not establish lasting local benefit.
Identify who could use the knowledge, market or capability and what support is required. Compare local skills, supplier links and the value retained in India.
They can compare a defined system, document sources and limitations, and develop an India-fit research brief. Faculty supervision and institutional consent should be explicit.
No partnership should be inferred from an example or target list. Participation requires agreement by the relevant people and institutions before it is described as confirmed.
Map important suppliers, markets, routes and replacement options. Compare concentration, disruption and domestic capability without assuming every international link creates the same risk.
Clarify roles, scope, ethics, data handling, ownership, publication and how disagreements are resolved. The website concept does not replace an institutional agreement.
Consider worker conditions, mobility, skills and who receives the benefit alongside trade or investment figures. Report unequal or unintended effects.
A useful review connects the proposed mechanism with evidence of Indian capability, access, livelihoods or resilience. Record costs, limitations and the decision to continue or redesign.